Mazda CX-70 vs Peugeot 3008
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Mazda CX-70 starts from $76,720 before on-road costs, while the Peugeot 3008 opens at $52,990. That makes the Peugeot 3008 the more affordable entry point by $23,730.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $84,392 and $58,289 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Peugeot 3008 by roughly $3,135 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
The Mazda CX-70 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the Peugeot 3008.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Mazda CX-70 packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the Peugeot 3008.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Mazda CX-70 and 6 in the Peugeot 3008. The Mazda CX-70 adds a 360-degree camera that the Peugeot 3008 misses.
Feature Showdown
The Mazda CX-70 features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Peugeot 3008 gets a 21-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments.
The Mazda CX-70 stands out with head-up display and Bose audio that you will not find on the Peugeot 3008. The Peugeot 3008 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Mazda CX-70 gets leather upholstery while the Peugeot 3008 offers cloth.
Drivetrain
The Mazda CX-70 uses a Petrol producing 254kW and 500Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout.
The Peugeot 3008 responds with a Hybrid making 100kW and 230Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.2 seconds.
The Mazda CX-70 has the clear power advantage at 254kW vs 100kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mazda CX-70 measures 5,120mm long on a 3,120mm wheelbase, 578mm longer than the Peugeot 3008 at 4,542mm (2,730mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-70 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 598L in the Mazda CX-70 and 520L in the Peugeot 3008, giving the Mazda CX-70 a 78L advantage.
For towing, the Mazda CX-70 leads with a 2,500kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 1,300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.4m to 11.8m
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Mazda CX-70 and $1,682/year for the Peugeot 3008. That is a $627 annual difference in favour of the Peugeot 3008.
Estimated annual total: $2,309 (Mazda CX-70) vs $1,682 (Peugeot 3008). The Peugeot 3008 saves you roughly $627 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-70) vs 5 years / 200,000km (Peugeot 3008). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mazda CX-70 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Peugeot 3008 if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Peugeot's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Mazda CX-70 takes 4 of 6 key spec categories. The Peugeot 3008 will save you roughly $627 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-70 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-70 and Peugeot 3008?
The Peugeot 3008 is the cheapest at $52,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-70 by $23,730.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Peugeot 3008 uses the least fuel at 5.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
The Mazda CX-70 has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.
Which has the most boot space?
The Mazda CX-70 has the largest boot at 598L.
Which can tow the most?
The Mazda CX-70 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mazda CX-70 makes the most power at 254kW.
Get ahead of your next car
Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
