MG QS vs Alfa Romeo Junior
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
MG QS
From $46,990
SUV
Petrol
2.0L Turbo Petrol
153kW
8.4 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
203L
Alfa Romeo Junior
From $45,900
SUV
Petrol
Petrol MHEV
100kW
4.1 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
415L
Track the MG QS & Alfa Romeo Junior
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The MG QS starts from $46,990 before on-road costs, while the Alfa Romeo Junior opens at $45,900. That makes the Alfa Romeo Junior the more affordable entry point by $1,090.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $51,689 and $50,490 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Alfa Romeo Junior by roughly $6,125 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The MG QS features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Alfa Romeo Junior gets a 10.3-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The MG QS stands out with panoramic roof that you will not find on the Alfa Romeo Junior. The Alfa Romeo Junior counters with wireless charging. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the MG QS gets fabric upholstery while the Alfa Romeo Junior offers cloth. Climate control is 3-zone in the MG QS and 1-zone in the Alfa Romeo Junior.
Drivetrain
The MG QS uses a 2.0L Turbo Petrol producing 153kW and 360Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout.
The Alfa Romeo Junior responds with a Petrol MHEV making 100kW and 230Nm, paired to a dct driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.9 seconds.
The MG QS has the clear power advantage at 153kW vs 100kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The MG QS measures 4,983mm long on a 2,915mm wheelbase, 813mm longer than the Alfa Romeo Junior at 4,170mm (2,557mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG QS generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 203L in the MG QS and 415L in the Alfa Romeo Junior, giving the Alfa Romeo Junior a 212L advantage. The MG QS seats 7 vs 5.
For towing, the MG QS leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 500kg. That 1,500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.8m diameter
Good
Based on 10.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,394/year for the MG QS and $1,169/year for the Alfa Romeo Junior. That is a $1,225 annual difference in favour of the Alfa Romeo Junior.
Estimated annual total: $2,394 (MG QS) vs $1,169 (Alfa Romeo Junior). The Alfa Romeo Junior saves you roughly $1,225 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 10 years / 250,000km (MG QS) vs 5 years / 150,000km (Alfa Romeo Junior). The MG QS has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the MG QS if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Alfa Romeo Junior if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Alfa Romeo's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
This is genuinely close. The MG QS and Alfa Romeo Junior trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Alfa Romeo Junior will save you roughly $1,225 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Alfa Romeo Junior has a clear edge. The MG QS adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, MG QS and Alfa Romeo Junior?
The Alfa Romeo Junior is the cheapest at $45,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the MG QS by $1,090.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Alfa Romeo Junior uses the least fuel at 4.1L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — MG QS all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Alfa Romeo Junior has the largest boot at 415L.
Which can tow the most?
The MG QS has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The MG QS has the longest warranty at 10 years / 250k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The MG QS makes the most power at 153kW.
Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet
Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
