Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV vs Volvo XC90

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV starts from $58,990 before on-road costs, while the Volvo XC90 opens at $97,990. That makes the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV the more affordable entry point by $39,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $64,889 and $107,789 respectively.

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Volvo XC90, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV by roughly $11,255 in fuel alone.

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

How long each takes to charge — from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC — estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Volvo XC90 gets a 11.2-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV stands out with Apple CarPlay and Yamaha audio that you will not find on the Volvo XC90. The Volvo XC90 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats and Bowers & Wilkins audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV gets cloth upholstery while the Volvo XC90 offers leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and 4-zone in the Volvo XC90.

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV uses a Petrol producing 221kW and 195Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7 seconds.

The Volvo XC90 responds with a 2.0L 4-cyl turbocharged 48V mild hybrid B5 making 183kW and 350Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.6 seconds.

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has the clear power advantage at 221kW vs 183kW. In the real-world sprint, the Volvo XC90 is 0.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV measures 4,720mm long on a 2,704mm wheelbase, 233mm shorter than the Volvo XC90 at 4,953mm (2,984mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Volvo XC90 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 472L in the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and 810L in the Volvo XC90, giving the Volvo XC90 a 338L advantage. The Volvo XC90 seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Volvo XC90 leads with a 2,400kg braked capacity vs 1,600kg. That 800kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $58/year for the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and $2,309/year for the Volvo XC90. That is a $2,251 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV.

Estimated annual total: $58 (Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV) vs $2,309 (Volvo XC90). The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV saves you roughly $2,251 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo XC90). The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has longer coverage.