CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsRAM 1500 vs Ford F-150
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

RAM 1500 vs Ford F-150

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecRAMFord
Price (RRP)$119,950$114,950
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power291kW298kW
0-100 km/h7.5s
Fuel Economy13.1 L/100km13.4 L/100km
Boot Space900L
Towing4,500kg4,500kg
Warranty3yr / 100k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the RAM 1500 & Ford F-150

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The RAM 1500 starts from $119,950 before on-road costs, while the Ford F-150 opens at $114,950. That makes the Ford F-150 the more affordable entry point by $5,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $131,945 and $126,445 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The RAM 1500 features a 8.4-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Ford F-150 gets a 12-inch display and 12-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The RAM 1500 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, heated front seats and power tailgate that you will not find on the Ford F-150. The Ford F-150 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The RAM 1500 uses a Petrol V8 producing 291kW and 556Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.5 seconds.

The Ford F-150 responds with a Petrol V6 Twin-Turbo (EcoBoost) making 298kW and 678Nm, paired to a 10-speed automatic driving all four wheels.

The Ford F-150 has the clear power advantage at 298kW vs 291kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The RAM 1500 measures 5,916mm long on a 3,672mm wheelbase, 292mm shorter than the Ford F-150 at 6,208mm (3,997mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford F-150 generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Ford F-150 leads with a 4,500kg braked capacity vs 4,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

14.4m to 15.6m

TightestRAM 1500 Big Horn V8Tightest turn at 14.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
RAM 1500 Big Horn V8
14.4mTighter
Best
Ford F-150 XLT 4x4 Double Cab LWB
15.6m
Worst
RAM 1500 Big Horn V8
14.4m · Large

Based on 14.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Ford F-150 XLT 4x4 Double Cab LWB
15.6m · Large

Based on 15.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestRAM 1500Tightest turn at 14.4m, needs the least road to swing around
RAM 1500Tightest14.4 m
Large△ 3-point
Ford F-15015.6 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $3,734/year for the RAM 1500 and $3,819/year for the Ford F-150. That is a $85 annual difference in favour of the RAM 1500.

Estimated annual total: $3,734 (RAM 1500) vs $3,819 (Ford F-150). The RAM 1500 saves you roughly $85 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (RAM 1500) vs 5 years (Ford F-150). The Ford F-150 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the RAM 1500 if: You want lower running costs, or prefer RAM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Ford F-150 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Ford F-150 takes 3 of 4 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The RAM 1500 will save you roughly $85 a year in fuel. The Ford F-150 adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, RAM 1500 and Ford F-150?

The Ford F-150 is the cheapest at $114,950 before on-road costs. That undercuts the RAM 1500 by $5,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The RAM 1500 uses the least fuel at 13.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of RAM 1500 and Ford F-150 carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which can tow the most?

The RAM 1500 has the highest braked towing capacity at 4,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Ford F-150 has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Ford F-150 makes the most power at 298kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia