Skoda Kodiaq vs Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Skoda Kodiaq
From $54,990
SUV
Petrol
110kW
6.4 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
270L
Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid
From $49,550
SUV
1.5L Turbocharged Petrol
225kW
1.3 kWh/100km
ANCAP: no data
143L
Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.
Price Breakdown
The Skoda Kodiaq starts from $54,990 before on-road costs, while the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid opens at $49,550. That makes the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid the more affordable entry point by $5,440.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $60,489 and $54,505 respectively.
The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Skoda Kodiaq, as a petrol model, does not qualify.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid by roughly $8,810 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Skoda Kodiaq features a 13-inch touchscreen paired with a 10-inch digital dash, while the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid gets a 15.6-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid counters with wireless charging, panoramic roof, Sony audio and ambient lighting that the Skoda Kodiaq does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Skoda Kodiaq gets leather upholstery while the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 3-zone in the Skoda Kodiaq and 2-zone in the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid.
Drivetrain
The Skoda Kodiaq uses a Petrol producing 110kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.1 seconds.
The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid responds with a 1.5L Turbocharged Petrol making 225kW and 215Nm, paired to a dedicated hybrid transmission (3dht) driving the front wheels.
The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid has the clear power advantage at 225kW vs 110kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Skoda Kodiaq measures 4,758mm long on a 2,791mm wheelbase, 42mm shorter than the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid at 4,800mm (2,750mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Skoda Kodiaq generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 270L in the Skoda Kodiaq and 143L in the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid, giving the Skoda Kodiaq a 127L advantage.
For towing, the Skoda Kodiaq leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.4m diameter
Average
Based on 11.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,824/year for the Skoda Kodiaq and $62/year for the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid. That is a $1,762 annual difference in favour of the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid.
Estimated annual total: $1,824 (Skoda Kodiaq) vs $62 (Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid). The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid saves you roughly $1,762 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Kodiaq) vs 7 years (Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: —7yr (Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid).
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Skoda Kodiaq if: You need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid will save you roughly $1,762 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Skoda Kodiaq has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Skoda Kodiaq and Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid?
The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid is the cheapest at $49,550 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Skoda Kodiaq by $5,440.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid uses the least fuel at 1.3L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Skoda Kodiaq all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Skoda Kodiaq has the largest boot at 270L.
Which can tow the most?
The Skoda Kodiaq has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid makes the most power at 225kW.
Get ahead of your next car
Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
