Suzuki Fronx vs BYD Atto 2 DM-i
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 30 Aug 2026, price 8 Sep 2026
BYD Atto 2 DM-i: not on sale yet, so BYD hasn't published warranty and CO2 emissions.
A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.
Track the Suzuki Fronx & BYD Atto 2 DM-i
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Suzuki Fronx starts from $28,490 before on-road costs, while the BYD Atto 2 DM-i opens at $24,990. That makes the BYD Atto 2 DM-i the more affordable entry point by $3,500.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $31,339 and $27,489 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the BYD Atto 2 DM-i by roughly $5,760 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Recalls on our record
Suzuki Fronx
- REC-006521 · published 23 Dec 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the left rear seat belt retractor mechanism may not operate as intended.Year range on the notice: 2025
- REC-006520 · published 23 Dec 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the left rear seat belt retractor mechanism may not operate as intended.Year range on the notice: 2025
BYD Atto 2 DM-i
None open on our record
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Charging Times
How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.
How long to charge
7.9kWh usableEstimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
Feature Showdown
The Suzuki Fronx features a 9-inch touchscreen, while the BYD Atto 2 DM-i gets a 10.1-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Suzuki Fronx stands out with Apple CarPlay — features our data doesn't list for the BYD Atto 2 DM-i. The BYD Atto 2 DM-i counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and V2L. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Suzuki Fronx uses a Petrol producing 75.8kW and 137Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.5 seconds.
The BYD Atto 2 DM-i responds with a 1.5L 4-cylinder petrol making 122kW and 300Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.1 seconds.
The BYD Atto 2 DM-i has the clear power advantage at 122kW vs 75.8kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the BYD Atto 2 DM-i is 2.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Suzuki Fronx measures 3,995mm long on a 2,520mm wheelbase, 335mm shorter than the BYD Atto 2 DM-i at 4,330mm (2,620mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BYD Atto 2 DM-i generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 304L in the Suzuki Fronx and 425L in the BYD Atto 2 DM-i, giving the BYD Atto 2 DM-i a 121L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 605L vs 1335L.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.4m to 10.6m
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,397/year for the Suzuki Fronx and $245/year for the BYD Atto 2 DM-i. That is a $1,152 annual difference in favour of the BYD Atto 2 DM-i.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Suzuki Fronx if: You or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the BYD Atto 2 DM-i if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer BYD's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
BYD Atto 2 DM-i: Top CarSorted Score, 61 vs 54
The BYD Atto 2 DM-i comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (61 vs 54), taking 6 of 6 key spec rows below and coming in at a lower price. The deciding gaps: technology (BYD Atto 2 DM-i ahead by 20), performance (BYD Atto 2 DM-i ahead by 19), safety (BYD Atto 2 DM-i ahead by 14). The BYD Atto 2 DM-i will save you roughly $1,152 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the BYD Atto 2 DM-i has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Suzuki Fronx and BYD Atto 2 DM-i?
The BYD Atto 2 DM-i is the cheapest at $24,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Suzuki Fronx by $3,500.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Suzuki Fronx uses the least fuel at 4.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
Suzuki Fronx holds a 1-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for BYD Atto 2 DM-i, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which has the most boot space?
The BYD Atto 2 DM-i has the largest boot at 425L with the seats up (1,335L with the seats folded).
Which is the most powerful?
The BYD Atto 2 DM-i makes the most power at 122kW. The BYD Atto 2 DM-i is quickest to 100km/h in 9.1s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
