CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsToyota Prado vs Mazda CX-70
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Toyota Prado vs Mazda CX-70

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecToyotaMazda
Price (RRP)$72,500$76,720
Fuel typeDieselPetrol
Power150kW254kW
0-100 km/h9.6s6.8s
Fuel Economy7.6 L/100km8.1 L/100km
Boot Space408L598L
Towing3,500kg2,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Toyota Prado & Mazda CX-70

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Toyota Prado starts from $72,500 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-70 opens at $76,720. That makes the Toyota Prado the more affordable entry point by $4,220.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $79,750 and $84,392 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Toyota Prado features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-70 gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments.

The Toyota Prado stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that you will not find on the Mazda CX-70. The Mazda CX-70 counters with head-up display and Bose audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Toyota Prado gets cloth upholstery while the Mazda CX-70 offers leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the Toyota Prado and 3-zone in the Mazda CX-70.

Drivetrain

The Toyota Prado uses a 2.8L 4-cyl Turbo-Diesel 48V V-Active producing 150kW and 500Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.6 seconds.

The Mazda CX-70 responds with a Petrol making 254kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.8 seconds.

The Mazda CX-70 has the clear power advantage at 254kW vs 150kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-70 is 2.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Toyota Prado measures 4,990mm long on a 2,850mm wheelbase, 130mm shorter than the Mazda CX-70 at 5,120mm (3,120mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-70 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 408L in the Toyota Prado and 598L in the Mazda CX-70, giving the Mazda CX-70 a 190L advantage.

For towing, the Toyota Prado leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,500kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.8m to 12.0m

Mazda CX-70 G50e GT
11.8mTighter
Best
Toyota Prado GX Diesel
12.0m
Worst
Toyota Prado GX Diesel
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-70 G50e GT
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,166/year for the Toyota Prado and $2,309/year for the Mazda CX-70. That is a $143 annual difference in favour of the Toyota Prado.

Estimated annual total: $2,166 (Toyota Prado) vs $2,309 (Mazda CX-70). The Toyota Prado saves you roughly $143 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota Prado) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-70). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Toyota Prado if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-70 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Toyota Prado and Mazda CX-70 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Toyota Prado will save you roughly $143 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-70 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Toyota Prado and Mazda CX-70?

The Toyota Prado is the cheapest at $72,500 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-70 by $4,220.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota Prado uses the least fuel at 7.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Toyota Prado all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda CX-70 has the largest boot at 598L.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota Prado has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-70 makes the most power at 254kW. The Mazda CX-70 is quickest to 100km/h in 6.8s.

Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet

Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs · Best hybrid cars