BYD Shark 6 vs Toyota LandCruiser 70
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
BYD Shark 6
From $55,900
Ute
Plug-in Hybrid
Hybrid
321kW
2 kWh/100km
5★ ANCAP
—
Overseas model shownToyota LandCruiser 70
From $75,600
Wagon
Diesel
Diesel
150kW
10.6 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
—
Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.
Track the BYD Shark 6 & Toyota LandCruiser 70
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The BYD Shark 6 starts from $55,900 before on-road costs, while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 opens at $75,600. That makes the BYD Shark 6 the more affordable entry point by $19,700.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $61,490 and $83,160 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the BYD Shark 6 by roughly $13,210 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Charging Times
How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.
How long to charge
29.6kWh usablePublic DC
50kW charger · 0–80%
Ultra-rapid DC
up to 55kW · 0–80%
Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7kW AC, 55kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
Feature Showdown
The BYD Shark 6 features a 12.8-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 gets a 6.7-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments.
The BYD Shark 6 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, V2L and Dynaudio audio — features our data doesn't list for the Toyota LandCruiser 70. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the BYD Shark 6 gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 offers cloth. Climate control is 2-zone in the BYD Shark 6 and 1-zone in the Toyota LandCruiser 70.
Drivetrain
The BYD Shark 6 uses a Hybrid producing 321kW and 650Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout.
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12 seconds.
The BYD Shark 6 has the clear power advantage at 321kW vs 150kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The BYD Shark 6 measures 5,413mm long on a 3,260mm wheelbase, 548mm longer than the Toyota LandCruiser 70 at 4,865mm (2,730mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BYD Shark 6 generally means more rear legroom.
For towing, the Toyota LandCruiser 70 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,500kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
12.6m to 13.5m
Based on 13.5m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 12.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $379/year for the BYD Shark 6 and $3,021/year for the Toyota LandCruiser 70. That is a $2,642 annual difference in favour of the BYD Shark 6.
Warranty: 6 years / 150,000km (BYD Shark 6) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser 70). The BYD Shark 6 has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the BYD Shark 6 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer BYD's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 70 if: You need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The BYD Shark 6 takes 4 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The BYD Shark 6 will save you roughly $2,642 a year in fuel. The BYD Shark 6 adds peace of mind with a longer 6-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, BYD Shark 6 and Toyota LandCruiser 70?
The BYD Shark 6 is the cheapest at $55,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota LandCruiser 70 by $19,700.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The BYD Shark 6 uses the least fuel at 2L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
BYD Shark 6 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Toyota LandCruiser 70, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which can tow the most?
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The BYD Shark 6 has the longest warranty at 6 years / 150k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The BYD Shark 6 makes the most power at 321kW.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
