CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Mazda CX-70 vs Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-70 vs Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 30 Aug 2026, price 6 Sep 2026

Driver assistance, as the maker lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
Mazda CX-70G50e GT12000
Chery Tiggo 9 Super HybridElite10?02

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

Specifications in progress

Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid: we're still completing 0-100km/h, ground clearance, turning circle and energy consumption.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecMazdaChery
Price (RRP)$73,020$52,990 est.
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

$73,020RRP

  • no option data for this car

$52,990est. RRP

  • no option data for this car

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typePetrolPlug-in Hybrid
Range—90km
Battery—19 kWh
Electric range—90km
Power254kW225kW
0-100 km/h6.8s—
Max DC Charge—41kW
Fuel Economy8.1 L/100km1.5 kWh/100km
Boot (seats up)598L143L
Towing2,500kg1,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited7yr / No data
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the Mazda CX-70 & Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mazda CX-70 starts from $73,020 before on-road costs, while the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid opens at $52,990 (our estimated RRP; the brand lists drive-away prices only). Both land at the same RRP, so on-road costs and dealer deals become the real differentiator.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $80,322 and $58,289 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid by roughly $11,185 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

Mazda CX-70

  • REC-006434 · published 15 Sep 2025Due to a software programming issue of the Body Control Module (BCM), the instrument cluster fuel level may not operate as intended.Year range on the notice: 2023 - 2025

Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid

None open on our record

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

19kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

22 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 41kW · 0–80%

28 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC, 41kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda CX-70 features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid gets a 15.6-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments.

The Mazda CX-70 stands out with head-up display and Bose audio — features our data doesn't list for the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid. The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats, power tailgate, Sony audio and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mazda CX-70 gets leather upholstery while the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 3-zone in the Mazda CX-70 and 2-zone in the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-70 uses a Petrol producing 254kW and 500Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.8 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid responds with a 1.5L Turbocharged Petrol making 225kW and 450Nm, paired to a dedicated hybrid transmission (3dht) driving the front wheels.

The Mazda CX-70 has the clear power advantage at 254kW vs 225kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-70 measures 5,120mm long on a 3,120mm wheelbase, 320mm longer than the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid at 4,800mm (2,750mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-70 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 598L in the Mazda CX-70 and 143L in the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid, giving the Mazda CX-70 a 455L advantage. The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Mazda CX-70 leads with a 2,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.8m diameter

Average

Mazda CX-70 G50e GT
11.8m
←
Mazda CX-70 G50e GT
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.8 m Ø

Average

9.0 m road
Mazda CX-70 Turning circle · Ø 11.8 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 10.1 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

!

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: 3-point turn

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

✓

Standard parking bay

2.0 m wide: fits with room

!

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: careful, tight swing

✕

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Mazda CX-70 and $72/year for the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid. That is a $2,237 annual difference in favour of the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-70) vs 7 years (Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid). The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: —7yr (Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid).

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-70 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid if: You want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid: Top CarSorted Score, 74 vs 72

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (74 vs 72), taking 1 of 4 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: practicality (Mazda CX-70 ahead by 27), value (Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid ahead by 23), fuel economy (Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid ahead by 20). The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid will save you roughly $2,237 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-70 has a clear edge. The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-70 and Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid?

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid is the cheapest at $52,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-70 by $20,030.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid uses the least fuel at 1.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Mazda CX-70 and Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda CX-70 has the largest boot at 598L with the seats up (2,015L with the seats folded).

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-70 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid has the longest warranty at 7 years / No data.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-70 makes the most power at 254kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best hybrid cars · Best electric SUVs