CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Peugeot 2008 vs Toyota C-HR
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Peugeot 2008 vs Toyota C-HR

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 1 Sep 2026, price 24 Jun 2026

SpecPeugeotToyota
Price (RRP)$42,490$46,940
Fuel typeHybridHybrid
Power107kW103kW
0-100 km/h8.3s10.2s
Fuel Economy4.4 L/100km4 L/100km
Boot (seats up)434L388L
Towing1,100kg725kg
Warranty5yr / 200k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Peugeot 2008 & Toyota C-HR

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Peugeot 2008 starts from $42,490 before on-road costs, while the Toyota C-HR opens at $46,940. That makes the Peugeot 2008 the more affordable entry point by $4,450.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $46,739 and $51,634 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

Peugeot 2008

  • REC-006684 · published 27 Jul 2026Due to a manufacturing defect, affected vehicles may have been assembled with insufficient clearance between the gasoline particulate filter pipe and the pole protection cup of the 48V belt starter generator.Year range on the notice: 2024 - 2026
  • REC-006397 · published 29 Jul 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the threaded connection between the high-pressure fuel pump and the fuel rail may become loose.Year range on the notice: 2024 - 2025
  • REC-005686 · published 30 May 2023The timing belt may degrade due to aged engine oil.Year range on the notice: 2017 - 2020
  • 3 more on the model page.

Toyota C-HR

  • REC-005804 · published 23 Oct 2023The internal components of the fuel pump may wear and fracture the welded area of the fuel pump, which could lead to a fuel leak in the engine compartment.Year range on the notice: 2019 - 2023
  • REC-005068 · published 10 Mar 2022The vehicle's front radar sensor which supports certain driver assistance features, including the Pre-Collision System (PCS) may not have been calibrated during vehicle manufacture.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2021
  • REC-001645 · published 20 Jun 2021The internal components of the fuel pump may wear and fracture the welded area of the fuel pump, which could lead to a fuel leak in the engine compartment.Year range on the notice: 2019 - 2021
  • 1 more on the model page.

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

The Peugeot 2008 features a 10-inch touchscreen paired with a 10-inch digital dash, while the Toyota C-HR gets a 12.3-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Peugeot 2008 stands out with wireless charging and Focal audio — features our data doesn't list for the Toyota C-HR. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Peugeot 2008 uses a Hybrid producing 107kW and 230Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.3 seconds.

The Toyota C-HR responds with a Petrol making 103kW and 142Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.2 seconds.

The Peugeot 2008 has the clear power advantage at 107kW vs 103kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Peugeot 2008 is 1.9s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Peugeot 2008 measures 4,300mm long on a 2,605mm wheelbase, 62mm shorter than the Toyota C-HR at 4,362mm (2,640mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota C-HR generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 434L in the Peugeot 2008 and 388L in the Toyota C-HR, giving the Peugeot 2008 a 46L advantage.

For towing, the Peugeot 2008 leads with a 1,100kg braked capacity vs 725kg. That 375kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.4m to 10.6m

TightestToyota C-HR GXLTightest turn at 10.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Toyota C-HR GXL
10.4mTighter
Best
Peugeot 2008 Allure Hybrid
10.6m
Worst
Peugeot 2008 Allure Hybrid
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota C-HR GXL
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestToyota C-HRTightest turn at 10.4m, needs the least road to swing around
Peugeot 200810.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Toyota C-HRTightest10.4 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,254/year for the Peugeot 2008 and $1,140/year for the Toyota C-HR. That is a $114 annual difference in favour of the Toyota C-HR.

Warranty: 5 years / 200,000km (Peugeot 2008) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota C-HR). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Peugeot 2008 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Peugeot's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota C-HR if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

Toyota C-HR: Top CarSorted Score, 73 vs 68, but the Peugeot 2008 is $4,450 cheaper

The Toyota C-HR comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (73 vs 68), taking 1 of 6 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: safety (Toyota C-HR ahead by 27), performance (Peugeot 2008 ahead by 13), reliability (Toyota C-HR ahead by 12). The Toyota C-HR will save you roughly $114 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Peugeot 2008 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Peugeot 2008 and Toyota C-HR?

The Peugeot 2008 is the cheapest at $42,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota C-HR by $4,450.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota C-HR uses the least fuel at 4L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Toyota C-HR holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Peugeot 2008, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Peugeot 2008 has the largest boot at 434L with the seats up.

Which can tow the most?

The Peugeot 2008 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,100kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Peugeot 2008 makes the most power at 107kW. The Peugeot 2008 is quickest to 100km/h in 8.3s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best hybrid cars