CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsChery Tiggo 4 Hybrid vs Suzuki Ignis
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid vs Suzuki Ignis

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCherySuzuki
Price (RRP)$27,500$22,490
Fuel typeHybridPetrol
Power150kW66kW
0-100 km/h10.5s12.8s
Fuel Economy5.4 L/100km4.9 L/100km
Boot Space470L271L
Warranty7yr / Unlimited3yr / 100k km
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid & Suzuki Ignis

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid starts from $27,500 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Ignis opens at $22,490. That makes the Suzuki Ignis the more affordable entry point by $5,010.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. Estimated driveaway prices sit around $29,990 for the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and $25,135 for the Suzuki Ignis.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Suzuki Ignis gets a 7-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid uses a Petrol I4 + HEV producing 150kW and 310Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.

The Suzuki Ignis responds with a Petrol making 66kW and 120Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12.8 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 66kW. In the real-world sprint, the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid is 2.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid measures 4,330mm long on a 2,604mm wheelbase, 630mm longer than the Suzuki Ignis at 3,700mm (2,435mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 470L in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and 271L in the Suzuki Ignis, giving the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid a 199L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.4m to 10.6m

TightestSuzuki Ignis GL AutoTightest turn at 9.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Suzuki Ignis GL Auto
9.4mTighter
Best
Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid Urban
10.6m
Worst
Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid Urban
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Suzuki Ignis GL Auto
9.4m · Excellent

Based on 9.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSuzuki IgnisTightest turn at 9.4m, needs the least road to swing around
Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Suzuki IgnisTightest9.4 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,539/year for the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and $1,397/year for the Suzuki Ignis. That is a $142 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Ignis.

Estimated annual total: $1,539 (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid) vs $1,397 (Suzuki Ignis). The Suzuki Ignis saves you roughly $142 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Ignis). The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Suzuki Ignis if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid takes 4 of 6 key spec categories. The Suzuki Ignis will save you roughly $142 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has a clear edge. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and Suzuki Ignis?

The Suzuki Ignis is the cheapest at $22,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid by $5,010.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Suzuki Ignis uses the least fuel at 4.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and Suzuki Ignis carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has the largest boot at 470L.

Which has the best warranty?

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid makes the most power at 150kW. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid is quickest to 100km/h in 10.5s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best hybrid cars · Best mid-size SUVs