CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsChery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid vs Hyundai Kona
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid vs Hyundai Kona

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCheryHyundai
Price (RRP)$32,300$32,500
Fuel typePlug-in HybridPetrol
Range (WLTP)93km
Battery18.3 kWh
Electric range93km
Power180kW110kW
0-100 km/h9.5s9.9s
Max DC Charge40kW
Fuel Economy1.4 kWh/100km6.6 L/100km
Boot Space475L361L
Towing1,300kg
Warranty7yr / 0k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data4 Stars

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid & Hyundai Kona

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid starts from $32,300 before on-road costs, while the Hyundai Kona opens at $32,500. That makes the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid the more affordable entry point by $200.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $35,530 and $35,750 respectively.

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Hyundai Kona, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid by roughly $9,070 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge — from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC — estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

18.3kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

22 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 40kW · 0–80%

27 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (6.6kW AC, 40kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Hyundai Kona gets a 12.3-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that you will not find on the Hyundai Kona. The Hyundai Kona counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid uses a Petrol I4 Turbo + PHEV producing 180kW and 310Nm of torque, sent through a 1-speed dedicated hybrid transmission (dht) to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.5 seconds.

The Hyundai Kona responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 180Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.9 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid has the clear power advantage at 180kW vs 110kW. In the real-world sprint, the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid is 0.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid measures 4,535mm long on a 2,653mm wheelbase, 185mm longer than the Hyundai Kona at 4,350mm (2,660mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Hyundai Kona generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 475L in the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid and 361L in the Hyundai Kona, giving the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid a 114L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.2m

TightestHyundai Kona 2.0 FWDTightest turn at 10.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Hyundai Kona 2.0 FWD
10.6mTighter
Best
Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid Urban
11.2m
Worst
Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid Urban
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Hyundai Kona 2.0 FWD
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestHyundai KonaTightest turn at 10.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Hyundai KonaTightest10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $67/year for the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid and $1,881/year for the Hyundai Kona. That is a $1,814 annual difference in favour of the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid.

Estimated annual total: $67 (Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid) vs $1,881 (Hyundai Kona). The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid saves you roughly $1,814 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years (Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Hyundai Kona). The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Hyundai Kona if: You or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid takes 6 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid will save you roughly $1,814 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid has a clear edge. The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid and Hyundai Kona?

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid is the cheapest at $32,300 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Hyundai Kona by $200.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid uses the least fuel at 1.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Hyundai Kona all hold a 4-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid has the largest boot at 475L.

Which can tow the most?

The Hyundai Kona has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,300kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid has the longest warranty at 7 years / 0k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid makes the most power at 180kW. The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid is quickest to 100km/h in 9.5s.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best electric SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs