GWM Haval H6GT vs Toyota C-HR
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 1 Sep 2026, price 29 Jul 2026
Driver assistance, as the manufacturer lists it
Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.
StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.
From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.
No price
- no price to build from against the Toyota C-HR
$46,940RRP
- no option data for this car
Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.
Track the GWM Haval H6GT & Toyota C-HR
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
Both the GWM Haval H6GT and Toyota C-HR hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 88% for the GWM Haval H6GT and 85% for the Toyota C-HR.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 7 of 10 key ADAS systems on the GWM Haval H6GT, against 6 on the Toyota C-HR.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the GWM Haval H6GT and 10 in the Toyota C-HR.
Recalls on our record
GWM Haval H6GT
None open on our record
Toyota C-HR
- REC-005804 · published 23 Oct 2023The internal components of the fuel pump may wear and fracture the welded area of the fuel pump, which could lead to a fuel leak in the engine compartment.Year range on the notice: 2019 - 2023
- REC-005068 · published 10 Mar 2022The vehicle's front radar sensor which supports certain driver assistance features, including the Pre-Collision System (PCS) may not have been calibrated during vehicle manufacture.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2021
- REC-001645 · published 20 Jun 2021The internal components of the fuel pump may wear and fracture the welded area of the fuel pump, which could lead to a fuel leak in the engine compartment.Year range on the notice: 2019 - 2021
- 1 more on the model page.
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Feature Showdown
The GWM Haval H6GT features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Toyota C-HR gets a 12.3-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The GWM Haval H6GT stands out with head-up display, wireless charging, heated front seats and power tailgate — features our data doesn't list for the Toyota C-HR. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the GWM Haval H6GT gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Toyota C-HR offers cloth.
Drivetrain
The GWM Haval H6GT uses a Petrol producing 150kW and 320Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.5 seconds.
The Toyota C-HR responds with a Petrol making 103kW and 142Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.2 seconds.
The GWM Haval H6GT has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 103kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the GWM Haval H6GT is 1.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The GWM Haval H6GT measures 4,727mm long on a 2,738mm wheelbase, 365mm longer than the Toyota C-HR at 4,362mm (2,640mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Haval H6GT generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 392L in the GWM Haval H6GT and 388L in the Toyota C-HR, giving the GWM Haval H6GT a 4L advantage.
For towing, the GWM Haval H6GT leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 725kg. That 1,275kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.4m to 12.0m
Based on 12.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,394/year for the GWM Haval H6GT and $1,140/year for the Toyota C-HR. That is a $1,254 annual difference in favour of the Toyota C-HR.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Haval H6GT) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota C-HR). The GWM Haval H6GT has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the GWM Haval H6GT if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Toyota C-HR if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
Toyota C-HR: Top CarSorted Score, 81 vs 70
The Toyota C-HR comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (81 vs 70), taking 1 of 6 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: fuel economy (Toyota C-HR ahead by 40), value (Toyota C-HR ahead by 20), performance (GWM Haval H6GT ahead by 12). The Toyota C-HR will save you roughly $1,254 a year in fuel. The GWM Haval H6GT adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, GWM Haval H6GT and Toyota C-HR?
The Toyota C-HR is the cheapest at $46,940 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Toyota C-HR uses the least fuel at 4L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched on crash rating: GWM Haval H6GT and Toyota C-HR all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The GWM Haval H6GT has the largest boot at 392L with the seats up.
Which can tow the most?
The GWM Haval H6GT has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The GWM Haval H6GT has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The GWM Haval H6GT makes the most power at 150kW. The GWM Haval H6GT is quickest to 100km/h in 8.5s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
