Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid vs KGM Torres
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 31 Aug 2026, price 23 Sep 2026
Driver assistance, as the maker lists it
Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.
StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.
From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.
$32,300est. RRP
- no option data for this car
$34,990RRP
- no option data for this car
Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.
Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.
Track the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid & KGM Torres
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid starts from $32,300 (our estimated RRP; the brand lists drive-away prices only) before on-road costs, while the KGM Torres opens at $34,990. Both land at the same RRP, so on-road costs and dealer deals become the real differentiator.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $35,530 and $38,489 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid by roughly $10,925 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Recalls on our record
Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid
None open on our record
KGM Torres
None open on our record
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Charging Times
How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.
How long to charge
18.3kWh usablePublic DC
50kW charger · 0–80%
Ultra-rapid DC
up to 40kW · 0–80%
Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (6.6kW AC, 40kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
Feature Showdown
The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the KGM Torres gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto — features our data doesn't list for the KGM Torres. The KGM Torres counters with Apple CarPlay and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid gets synthetic leather upholstery while the KGM Torres offers leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid and 1-zone in the KGM Torres.
Drivetrain
The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid uses a Petrol I4 Turbo + PHEV producing 180kW and 310Nm of torque, sent through a 1-speed dedicated hybrid transmission (dht) to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.5 seconds.
The KGM Torres responds with a Turbo GDi making 120kW and 280Nm, paired to a 6-speed automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.8 seconds.
The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid has the clear power advantage at 180kW vs 120kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid is 2.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid measures 4,535mm long on a 2,653mm wheelbase, 165mm shorter than the KGM Torres at 4,700mm (2,700mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the KGM Torres generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 475L in the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid and 455L in the KGM Torres, giving the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid a 20L advantage.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.2m to 11.2m
Based on 11.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $67/year for the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid and $2,252/year for the KGM Torres. That is a $2,185 annual difference in favour of the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid.
Warranty: 7 years (Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid) vs 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Torres). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the KGM Torres if: You or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid: Top CarSorted Score, 78 vs 67
The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (78 vs 67), taking 3 of 4 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: safety (Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid ahead by 25), value (Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid ahead by 14), fuel economy (Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid ahead by 13). The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid will save you roughly $2,185 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid and KGM Torres?
The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid is the cheapest at $32,300 before on-road costs. That undercuts the KGM Torres by $2,690.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid uses the least fuel at 1.4L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for KGM Torres, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which has the most boot space?
The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid has the largest boot at 475L with the seats up.
Which can tow the most?
The KGM Torres has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid makes the most power at 180kW. The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid is quickest to 100km/h in 9.5s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
