CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Suzuki Fronx vs Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Suzuki Fronx vs Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 31 Aug 2026, price 14 Oct 2026

Suzuki Fronx
Suzuki

Suzuki Fronx

14 of 27 standard · no option data · 13 no data

From $27,250 est. RRP

Body

SUV

Fuel type

Hybrid

Engine

Petrol

Power

75.8kW

Economy

4.9 L/100km

Safety

1★ ANCAP

Boot (seats up)

304L

67CarSorted Score / 100
Winner
Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid
Chery

Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid

16 of 27 standard · no option data · 11 no data

From $32,300 est. RRP

Body

SUV

Fuel type

Plug-in Hybrid

Engine

Petrol I4 Turbo + PHEV

Power

180kW

Economy

1.4 kWh/100km

Safety

5★ ANCAP

Boot (seats up)

475L

78CarSorted Score / 100

Top CarSorted Score, 78 vs 67, but the Suzuki Fronx is $5,050 cheaper

Driver assistance, as the maker lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
Suzuki FronxGLX9?03
Chery Tiggo 7 Super HybridUrban10?02

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

SpecSuzukiChery
Price (RRP)$27,250 est.$32,300 est.
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

$27,250est. RRP

  • no option data for this car

$32,300est. RRP

  • no option data for this car

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typeHybridPlug-in Hybrid
Range (WLTP)—93km
Battery—18.3 kWh
Electric range—93km
Power75.8kW180kW
0-100 km/h11.5s9.5s
Max DC Charge—40kW
Fuel Economy4.9 L/100km1.4 kWh/100km
Boot (seats up)304L475L
Warranty3yr / 100k km7yr / No data
ANCAP Safety1 Stars5 Stars

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the Suzuki Fronx & Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Suzuki Fronx starts from $27,250 (our estimated RRP; the brand lists drive-away prices only) before on-road costs, while the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid opens at $32,300 (our estimated RRP; the brand lists drive-away prices only). That makes the Suzuki Fronx the more affordable entry point by $5,050.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. Estimated driveaway prices sit around $29,990 for the Suzuki Fronx and $34,990 for the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid by roughly $6,650 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 1 stars for the Suzuki Fronx. Adult occupant protection scored 48% for the Suzuki Fronx and 82% for the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 6 of 10 key ADAS systems on both.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Suzuki Fronx and 7 in the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid.

Recalls on our record

Suzuki Fronx

  • REC-006521 · published 23 Dec 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the left rear seat belt retractor mechanism may not operate as intended.Year range on the notice: 2025
  • REC-006520 · published 23 Dec 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the left rear seat belt retractor mechanism may not operate as intended.Year range on the notice: 2025

Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid

None open on our record

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

18.3kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

22 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 40kW · 0–80%

27 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (6.6kW AC, 40kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Suzuki Fronx features a 9-inch touchscreen, while the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Suzuki Fronx stands out with power tailgate — features our data doesn't list for the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Suzuki Fronx uses a Petrol producing 75.8kW and 137Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.5 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid responds with a Petrol I4 Turbo + PHEV making 180kW and 310Nm, paired to a 1-speed dedicated hybrid transmission (dht) driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.5 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid has the clear power advantage at 180kW vs 75.8kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid is 2.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Suzuki Fronx measures 3,995mm long on a 2,520mm wheelbase, 540mm shorter than the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid at 4,535mm (2,653mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 304L in the Suzuki Fronx and 475L in the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid, giving the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid a 171L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.4m to 11.2m

TightestSuzuki Fronx GLXTightest turn at 10.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Suzuki Fronx GLX
10.4mTighter
Best
Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid Urban
11.2m
Worst
Suzuki Fronx GLX
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid Urban
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSuzuki FronxTightest turn at 10.4m, needs the least road to swing around
Suzuki FronxTightest10.4 m
Good△ 3-point
Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,397/year for the Suzuki Fronx and $67/year for the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid. That is a $1,330 annual difference in favour of the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid.

Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Fronx) vs 7 years (Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid). The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Suzuki Fronx if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid: Top CarSorted Score, 78 vs 67, but the Suzuki Fronx is $5,050 cheaper

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (78 vs 67), taking 5 of 6 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: safety (Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid ahead by 34), performance (Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid ahead by 18), value (Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid ahead by 15). The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid will save you roughly $1,330 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid has a clear edge. The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Suzuki Fronx and Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid?

The Suzuki Fronx is the cheapest at $27,250 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid by $5,050.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid uses the least fuel at 1.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.

Which has the most boot space?

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid has the largest boot at 475L with the seats up.

Which has the best warranty?

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid has the longest warranty at 7 years / No data.

Which is the most powerful?

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid makes the most power at 180kW. The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid is quickest to 100km/h in 9.5s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best hybrid cars · Best electric SUVs